STORIES
Community
DONATE

REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION FROM THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

Australia Day inspires push for including Indigenous in constitution

by Rod McGuirk from Canberra, Australia

150582Aboriginal man Perek Mammup of the Muggera Dancers performs at an Invasion Day rally in Sydney, Jan. 26, 2023. Australia is marking the anniversary of British colonists settling modern day Sydney in 1788 while Indigenous protesters deride Australia Day as Invasion Day. Rick Rycroft/AP

January 26, 2023

The 235th anniversary of British colonization in Australia is also a reminder of how Indigenous peoples lost their land. Australians will vote soon on a policy that would recognize Indigenous people as Australia’s original inhabitants in the constitution.

Australians marked the 235th anniversary of British colonization on Thursday with a public holiday that evokes anger at Indigenous injustice, focusing national attention on a new government push to acknowledge Australia’s first inhabitants in the constitution.

The government joined several large corporations in allowing staff the choice of taking the holiday off or working on Thursday and taking another day off instead, in recognition of growing public unease at celebrating the 1788 hoisting of the Union Jack at Sydney Cove.

There are growing public calls to change the date of Australia Day, which is known to many Indigenous people as Invasion Day and Survival Day, because of the disastrous impacts on First Nations people of British colonists taking their land without a treaty.

The focus on Australia’s checkered European history ignited a debate about a referendum due late this year that would create an Indigenous body known as the Voice to address Parliament on Indigenous issues.

The referendum, expected to be held between August and November, would enshrine the Voice in the constitution.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese committed to the referendum on the day his center-left Labor Party government was elected in May last year.

Mr. Albanese said he wanted Indigenous people recognized as Australia’s original inhabitants in the constitution, which has existed since 1901, before next year’s Australia Day.

“If not now, when will this change occur? And if not the people of Australia this year, who will make this change which will improve our country, improve our national unity?” Mr. Albanese told reporters Thursday.

“It is a great country. Australia will be even better when we recognize our First Nations people in our constitution,” he added.

Noel Pearson, an Indigenous leader and longtime advocate of constitutional change, said the Voice would be a move toward a “settlement between the natives and those who took over the continent and established modern Australia.”

“This year is the most important year in the relationship between the natives of Australia and its so-called settlers in the 235 years since the landing of the First Fleet,” Mr. Pearson wrote on Thursday in The Sydney Morning Herald, referring to the 11 British ships carrying convicts that established Sydney as a penal colony.

The proposed referendum question only asks Australians if they agree with the Voice in principle.

“Do you support an alteration to the constitution that establishes an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice?” the government proposal asks.

If the answer is “yes,” the constitution would be rewritten to state that the Voice “may make representations” to the Parliament and executive government “on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.”

Proponents say there would be no Indigenous right to veto government policy and lawmakers would be free to disregard the Voice’s representations.

Opponents argue the courts might interpret the Voice’s constitutional powers in unpredictable ways, creating legal uncertainty. Other reactions to the Voice are mixed, including among Indigenous leaders.

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, an Indigenous senator for the conservative Nationals party, opposes the Voice. Her party supports her view that the Voice would divide Australia along racial lines.

Lidia Thorpe, an Indigenous senator for the progressive Greens party, on Wednesday threatened to oppose the Voice unless the referendum question includes an acknowledgment that traditional owners never gave up their land.

Opposition leader Peter Dutton said his conservative Liberal Party needed more detail about what the Voice would entail before they could decide whether to support constitutional change.

“As you move around the community, it’s quite obvious that people don’t understand what it is that the prime minister’s talking about,” Mr. Dutton told reporters.

“They understand that changing the constitution is a big deal and, instinctively like me and like millions of Australians, we want a better outcome for Indigenous Australians,” he added.

Indigenous Australians account for 3.2% of the population and are the nation’s most disadvantaged ethnic group. They die younger than other Australians, achieve lower education levels, are less likely to be employed, and are overrepresented in prison populations.

They were not allowed to vote in federal elections until 1962, and Australian courts did not acknowledge until 1992 that their ancestors had legally owned the land when the British arrived.

Australia Day celebrations Thursday centered on Sydney Harbor, where attractions included an annual race of historic sailing ships.

Separately, thousands gathered in downtown Sydney to commemorate the 85th anniversary of the original Mourning Day protest in 1938 when demonstrators made demands, including citizen rights, for Indigenous Australians.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

Related stories

·       THE EXPLAINER What are land acknowledgments, and how do they help Indigenous peoples?

·       FIRST LOOK Healing step: Australia pledges $813M for Indigenous peoples

·       Fighting ‘bad’ fire with good: Australia revisits an Aboriginal tradition

Page created on 2/1/2023 10:15:27 PM

Last edited 2/1/2023 10:32:32 PM

The beliefs, viewpoints and opinions expressed in this hero submission on the website are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the beliefs, viewpoints and opinions of The MY HERO Project and its staff.